<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kimkins.com Part III - Kimmer: Who Is She Really? (Includes Pictures)</title>
	<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/05/kimkinscom-part-iii-kimmer-who-is-she-really-includes-pictures/</link>
	<description>News and Views on Technology, Business and Internet Marketing</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 07:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: amy childers</title>
		<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/05/kimkinscom-part-iii-kimmer-who-is-she-really-includes-pictures/#comment-17348</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 02:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/05/kimkinscom-part-iii-kimmer-who-is-she-really-includes-pictures/#comment-17348</guid>
					<description>this whole thing is really just so sad....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this whole thing is really just so sad&#8230;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: lee semons</title>
		<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/05/kimkinscom-part-iii-kimmer-who-is-she-really-includes-pictures/#comment-15372</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 19:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/05/kimkinscom-part-iii-kimmer-who-is-she-really-includes-pictures/#comment-15372</guid>
					<description>that  heidi gal or may i say cow.......... is a big fat beach whale, with a lot of other fat people's money....................</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that  heidi gal or may i say cow&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;. is a big fat beach whale, with a lot of other fat people&#8217;s money&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Laura</title>
		<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/05/kimkinscom-part-iii-kimmer-who-is-she-really-includes-pictures/#comment-7152</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 23:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/05/kimkinscom-part-iii-kimmer-who-is-she-really-includes-pictures/#comment-7152</guid>
					<description>Does anyone know where the real Heidi is now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know where the real Heidi is now?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Julie</title>
		<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/05/kimkinscom-part-iii-kimmer-who-is-she-really-includes-pictures/#comment-4264</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 03:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/05/kimkinscom-part-iii-kimmer-who-is-she-really-includes-pictures/#comment-4264</guid>
					<description>Funny thing just happened...when I put this link on one of the Kimkins forums, within two minutes I was no longer able to log into the site.  I guess I've been kicked out of Kimkins!  I'm so glad you posted this information.  Working as a fraud investigator and knowing I got scammed by Heidi the lard-ass really pisses me off...the phony pics, the foster case BS, etc., it makes me sick.  We need your blog on the front cover of Woman's Magazine with "Kimmers" REAL photos...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny thing just happened&#8230;when I put this link on one of the Kimkins forums, within two minutes I was no longer able to log into the site.  I guess I&#8217;ve been kicked out of Kimkins!  I&#8217;m so glad you posted this information.  Working as a fraud investigator and knowing I got scammed by Heidi the lard-ass really pisses me off&#8230;the phony pics, the foster case BS, etc., it makes me sick.  We need your blog on the front cover of Woman&#8217;s Magazine with &#8220;Kimmers&#8221; REAL photos&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Miss Prissy</title>
		<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/05/kimkinscom-part-iii-kimmer-who-is-she-really-includes-pictures/#comment-3302</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 20:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/05/kimkinscom-part-iii-kimmer-who-is-she-really-includes-pictures/#comment-3302</guid>
					<description>Did Catherine, when the partnership dissolved, transfer payment to go directly into Heidi's Paypal once everything was wrapped up with their buyout?  Basically are payments for memberships now into Heidi Diaz Paypal, or another name was designated?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did Catherine, when the partnership dissolved, transfer payment to go directly into Heidi&#8217;s Paypal once everything was wrapped up with their buyout?  Basically are payments for memberships now into Heidi Diaz Paypal, or another name was designated?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/05/kimkinscom-part-iii-kimmer-who-is-she-really-includes-pictures/#comment-3267</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 12:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/05/kimkinscom-part-iii-kimmer-who-is-she-really-includes-pictures/#comment-3267</guid>
					<description>Miss Prissy -- Membership payments were sent to Catherine's PayPal account while Catherine was a partner, in other words until the end of September 2006.  Catherine paid all site expenses and then divided the profit 50/50.  Heidi's share of profits went to Heidi's PayPal account.  There was and is no reason to believe that the name on Heidi's PayPal account (Heidi Diaz) was fictitious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Miss Prissy &#8212; Membership payments were sent to Catherine&#8217;s PayPal account while Catherine was a partner, in other words until the end of September 2006.  Catherine paid all site expenses and then divided the profit 50/50.  Heidi&#8217;s share of profits went to Heidi&#8217;s PayPal account.  There was and is no reason to believe that the name on Heidi&#8217;s PayPal account (Heidi Diaz) was fictitious.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Miss Prissy</title>
		<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/05/kimkinscom-part-iii-kimmer-who-is-she-really-includes-pictures/#comment-3111</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 14:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/05/kimkinscom-part-iii-kimmer-who-is-she-really-includes-pictures/#comment-3111</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;"Heidi Diaz is the name that was on the PayPal account to which Kimmer’s share of the website profits were deposited."&lt;/i&gt;

Whose/what name was on the paypal account for the site registrations?  

From the above statement it seems that the PayPal account for Kimkins.com where memberships were paid for &lt;b&gt;is in a name other than Heidi Diaz&lt;/b&gt; and her "share" was then funneled out of that PayPal account into the Heidi Diaz account at PayPal.

What is this name?

And, even with Heidi Diaz on the Paypal account...was there any additional information attached to that account (address, phone, etc.) that would indicate that the name on the account itself was fictitious but the real information beyond the name on the account indicated who owned the account more accurately?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;Heidi Diaz is the name that was on the PayPal account to which Kimmer’s share of the website profits were deposited.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Whose/what name was on the paypal account for the site registrations?  </p>
<p>From the above statement it seems that the PayPal account for Kimkins.com where memberships were paid for <b>is in a name other than Heidi Diaz</b> and her &#8220;share&#8221; was then funneled out of that PayPal account into the Heidi Diaz account at PayPal.</p>
<p>What is this name?</p>
<p>And, even with Heidi Diaz on the Paypal account&#8230;was there any additional information attached to that account (address, phone, etc.) that would indicate that the name on the account itself was fictitious but the real information beyond the name on the account indicated who owned the account more accurately?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: losing fat ass</title>
		<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/05/kimkinscom-part-iii-kimmer-who-is-she-really-includes-pictures/#comment-1330</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 15:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/05/kimkinscom-part-iii-kimmer-who-is-she-really-includes-pictures/#comment-1330</guid>
					<description>right on Steph!!!


I have rad so many statements where ppl have put words into her mouth and are bending over backwards just to call her a liar. Just because YOUR ass is still fat, you dont have to make trouble for the ones of us who are losing ours…….</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>right on Steph!!!</p>
<p>I have rad so many statements where ppl have put words into her mouth and are bending over backwards just to call her a liar. Just because YOUR ass is still fat, you dont have to make trouble for the ones of us who are losing ours…….
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Slamboard &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More On Comments&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/05/kimkinscom-part-iii-kimmer-who-is-she-really-includes-pictures/#comment-1321</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 07:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/05/kimkinscom-part-iii-kimmer-who-is-she-really-includes-pictures/#comment-1321</guid>
					<description>[...] I would like to express my gratitude for all the comments made on my blog in relation to the series on Kimkins. I am happy to say that I have been able to approve every relevant comment regardless of the opinion of the commentor. I just approved a very adamant defense of Kimmer that anyone following the story will want to check out. The new comment is on Part III. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I would like to express my gratitude for all the comments made on my blog in relation to the series on Kimkins. I am happy to say that I have been able to approve every relevant comment regardless of the opinion of the commentor. I just approved a very adamant defense of Kimmer that anyone following the story will want to check out. The new comment is on Part III. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Steph</title>
		<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/05/kimkinscom-part-iii-kimmer-who-is-she-really-includes-pictures/#comment-1317</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 05:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/05/kimkinscom-part-iii-kimmer-who-is-she-really-includes-pictures/#comment-1317</guid>
					<description>You know what I dont get?  All the ignorance.  All of the pointing of fingers and determination to prove someone wrong.  Privacy is a BIG issue to some ppl, including myself.  So her name is Kimberly Heidi Diaz.  Big deal!  How many AUTHORS you know have changed their name for pulicaion purposes?  Actors?  Musicians?  It's all the same really, just wanting to protect her *right* to privacy.  And we all have the right, dont we?

As far as the pictures go......backin the 80's we all had big hair.  By the 90's we were highlighting it.  Cant expect her to have the same cut all the time do you?  SHe has OPENLY admitted to having some plastic surgery done.  You can bet your butt that I'll have a tummy tuck done too after I realy my goal weight.  So WHAT if she also had some facial surgery done?  The features in the pics ARE the same.  Same chin, smae bsic cheekbones, same nose.  After loosing THAT much weight, dont you think you'd look different too?   

What's it truly matter that no one has ever met her?  Maybe she's a very private person with social anxieties.  It's possible isn't it?  Of course it is, but here we go back to that thing, our determination to PROVE someone is full of it.....

I have rad so many statements where ppl have put words into her mouth and are bending over backwards just to call her a liar.  Just because YOUR ass is still fat, you dont have to make trouble for the ones of us who are losing ours.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know what I dont get?  All the ignorance.  All of the pointing of fingers and determination to prove someone wrong.  Privacy is a BIG issue to some ppl, including myself.  So her name is Kimberly Heidi Diaz.  Big deal!  How many AUTHORS you know have changed their name for pulicaion purposes?  Actors?  Musicians?  It&#8217;s all the same really, just wanting to protect her *right* to privacy.  And we all have the right, dont we?</p>
<p>As far as the pictures go&#8230;&#8230;backin the 80&#8217;s we all had big hair.  By the 90&#8217;s we were highlighting it.  Cant expect her to have the same cut all the time do you?  SHe has OPENLY admitted to having some plastic surgery done.  You can bet your butt that I&#8217;ll have a tummy tuck done too after I realy my goal weight.  So WHAT if she also had some facial surgery done?  The features in the pics ARE the same.  Same chin, smae bsic cheekbones, same nose.  After loosing THAT much weight, dont you think you&#8217;d look different too?   </p>
<p>What&#8217;s it truly matter that no one has ever met her?  Maybe she&#8217;s a very private person with social anxieties.  It&#8217;s possible isn&#8217;t it?  Of course it is, but here we go back to that thing, our determination to PROVE someone is full of it&#8230;..</p>
<p>I have rad so many statements where ppl have put words into her mouth and are bending over backwards just to call her a liar.  Just because YOUR ass is still fat, you dont have to make trouble for the ones of us who are losing ours&#8230;&#8230;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
