<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kimkins.com Part IV - The Kimkins.com Early Days</title>
	<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/10/kimkinscom-part-iv-the-kimkinscom-early-days/</link>
	<description>News and Views on Technology, Business and Internet Marketing</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: DebbieL</title>
		<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/10/kimkinscom-part-iv-the-kimkinscom-early-days/#comment-1405</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 18:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/10/kimkinscom-part-iv-the-kimkinscom-early-days/#comment-1405</guid>
					<description>Well, I guess this series is over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I guess this series is over.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: RAYSFARMGIRL</title>
		<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/10/kimkinscom-part-iv-the-kimkinscom-early-days/#comment-1253</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/10/kimkinscom-part-iv-the-kimkinscom-early-days/#comment-1253</guid>
					<description>If there are questions if Kimmers is being real or not--- Why doesn't someone that has subscribed to her kimkins.com tell the secret diet plan and food lists that have made her so popular?  Maybe that will stop her for making a profit and ripping everyone off?  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there are questions if Kimmers is being real or not&#8212; Why doesn&#8217;t someone that has subscribed to her kimkins.com tell the secret diet plan and food lists that have made her so popular?  Maybe that will stop her for making a profit and ripping everyone off?  <img src='http://www.slamboard.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: JimmySucks</title>
		<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/10/kimkinscom-part-iv-the-kimkinscom-early-days/#comment-1119</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 19:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/10/kimkinscom-part-iv-the-kimkinscom-early-days/#comment-1119</guid>
					<description>Nothing more in a week?  I'm losing interest fast now.  No update tomorrow and I'll be done with keeping your site in my bookmarks to check back with.  Sorry, but I have a life!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing more in a week?  I&#8217;m losing interest fast now.  No update tomorrow and I&#8217;ll be done with keeping your site in my bookmarks to check back with.  Sorry, but I have a life!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: JimmySucks</title>
		<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/10/kimkinscom-part-iv-the-kimkinscom-early-days/#comment-1064</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 13:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/10/kimkinscom-part-iv-the-kimkinscom-early-days/#comment-1064</guid>
					<description>In Jimmy Moore's podcast today he stated that Catherine contacted him in April 2006 and he agreed to be a Kimkins affiliate.  Based on the timeline above, he made that agreement weeks before the site was launched and admits he has been with this all since the beginning.  Any wonder he is so defensive and taking the to the idea he's a "victim" being "maliciously maligned" (his words, podcast 7-16-07)?  

Jimmy, you gotta get real dude!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Jimmy Moore&#8217;s podcast today he stated that Catherine contacted him in April 2006 and he agreed to be a Kimkins affiliate.  Based on the timeline above, he made that agreement weeks before the site was launched and admits he has been with this all since the beginning.  Any wonder he is so defensive and taking the to the idea he&#8217;s a &#8220;victim&#8221; being &#8220;maliciously maligned&#8221; (his words, podcast 7-16-07)?  </p>
<p>Jimmy, you gotta get real dude!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: AnOldHouse</title>
		<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/10/kimkinscom-part-iv-the-kimkinscom-early-days/#comment-1037</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 20:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/10/kimkinscom-part-iv-the-kimkinscom-early-days/#comment-1037</guid>
					<description>Martin,

I'm rather enjoying the methodical process you are using to unfold the story of your wife's initial involvement with Kimkins and the related issues including Jimmy Moore's involvement, membership bannings, etc.

Demands for you to just "post what you know now" are borne of the very same mentality for instant gratificaton that drives people to try something like Kimkins in the first place.

Please continue to take your time and provide us with the information at the pace you intend.  I'll be very patiently waiting!!!

Thanks again,
David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martin,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m rather enjoying the methodical process you are using to unfold the story of your wife&#8217;s initial involvement with Kimkins and the related issues including Jimmy Moore&#8217;s involvement, membership bannings, etc.</p>
<p>Demands for you to just &#8220;post what you know now&#8221; are borne of the very same mentality for instant gratificaton that drives people to try something like Kimkins in the first place.</p>
<p>Please continue to take your time and provide us with the information at the pace you intend.  I&#8217;ll be very patiently waiting!!!</p>
<p>Thanks again,<br />
David
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kimkinssucks</title>
		<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/10/kimkinscom-part-iv-the-kimkinscom-early-days/#comment-1030</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 17:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/10/kimkinscom-part-iv-the-kimkinscom-early-days/#comment-1030</guid>
					<description>Of course it works.  You could eat ANYTHING as long as you eat 500 - 600 calories a day - are you really that stupid?  It's not a secret nor is it "Kimkins" secret.

Once you eat normally, that 5 lbs will turn into a gain of 8 lbs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course it works.  You could eat ANYTHING as long as you eat 500 - 600 calories a day - are you really that stupid?  It&#8217;s not a secret nor is it &#8220;Kimkins&#8221; secret.</p>
<p>Once you eat normally, that 5 lbs will turn into a gain of 8 lbs.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: saucy blossom</title>
		<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/10/kimkinscom-part-iv-the-kimkinscom-early-days/#comment-1001</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 22:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/10/kimkinscom-part-iv-the-kimkinscom-early-days/#comment-1001</guid>
					<description>Uhhhhh........ I don't really care since the diet works.......I've lost 5 lbs in 4 days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uhhhhh&#8230;&#8230;.. I don&#8217;t really care since the diet works&#8230;&#8230;.I&#8217;ve lost 5 lbs in 4 days.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: greegreeyaya</title>
		<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/10/kimkinscom-part-iv-the-kimkinscom-early-days/#comment-995</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 19:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/10/kimkinscom-part-iv-the-kimkinscom-early-days/#comment-995</guid>
					<description>I agree with Lisa! 
C'mon Martin please get on with it the natives are getting restless!!!! LOL

I myself would love to see part VI + VII combined!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Lisa!<br />
C&#8217;mon Martin please get on with it the natives are getting restless!!!! LOL</p>
<p>I myself would love to see part VI + VII combined!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/10/kimkinscom-part-iv-the-kimkinscom-early-days/#comment-993</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 18:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/10/kimkinscom-part-iv-the-kimkinscom-early-days/#comment-993</guid>
					<description>People are searching for answers. What's the point in dragging this out for weeks on end? Why not just tell us what you know?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People are searching for answers. What&#8217;s the point in dragging this out for weeks on end? Why not just tell us what you know?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/10/kimkinscom-part-iv-the-kimkinscom-early-days/#comment-882</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 01:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/10/kimkinscom-part-iv-the-kimkinscom-early-days/#comment-882</guid>
					<description>I wonder why she still used the model pics after she clearly was somehow made aware back in July 2006 that there was a potential problem?  I had written to her in Feb. 2007 and asked her why she was using a famous model in the success story and she basically smarted off at me - then took them down shortly after.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder why she still used the model pics after she clearly was somehow made aware back in July 2006 that there was a potential problem?  I had written to her in Feb. 2007 and asked her why she was using a famous model in the success story and she basically smarted off at me - then took them down shortly after.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
