<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kimkins.com Part VI - The Partnership Buyout and the Post-Buyout Backstabbing</title>
	<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/27/kimkinscom-part-vi-the-partnership-buyout-and-the-post-buyout-backstabbing/</link>
	<description>News and Views on Technology, Business and Internet Marketing</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 07:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Kimkins Scam Background &#171; Say NO to Kimkins</title>
		<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/27/kimkinscom-part-vi-the-partnership-buyout-and-the-post-buyout-backstabbing/#comment-76315</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 07:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/27/kimkinscom-part-vi-the-partnership-buyout-and-the-post-buyout-backstabbing/#comment-76315</guid>
					<description>[...] Kimkins.com Part VI - The Partnership Buyout and the Post-Buyout Backstabbing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Kimkins.com Part VI - The Partnership Buyout and the Post-Buyout Backstabbing [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Unbelievable!</title>
		<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/27/kimkinscom-part-vi-the-partnership-buyout-and-the-post-buyout-backstabbing/#comment-7066</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 04:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/27/kimkinscom-part-vi-the-partnership-buyout-and-the-post-buyout-backstabbing/#comment-7066</guid>
					<description>Kimmer is very similar to the old Stillman's.  In my opinion, not only did she steal the Atkin's name and play off it, she also stole the Stillman's diet and did very little tweaking.

It is truly amazing to me that someone with NO medical background and without consulting or co-writing with a doctor of some sort has created an insane diet and that people actually follow it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kimmer is very similar to the old Stillman&#8217;s.  In my opinion, not only did she steal the Atkin&#8217;s name and play off it, she also stole the Stillman&#8217;s diet and did very little tweaking.</p>
<p>It is truly amazing to me that someone with NO medical background and without consulting or co-writing with a doctor of some sort has created an insane diet and that people actually follow it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: slamboard &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Kimmer/Heidi Diaz Rants About Everything Except the PI Pictures</title>
		<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/27/kimkinscom-part-vi-the-partnership-buyout-and-the-post-buyout-backstabbing/#comment-4502</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 22:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/27/kimkinscom-part-vi-the-partnership-buyout-and-the-post-buyout-backstabbing/#comment-4502</guid>
					<description>[...] Catherine did request a renegotiation of only the buyout clause for reasons discussed here. She was very happy that Heidi chose instead to trigger the buyout clause. Catherine’s part of the partnership was technical and customer service and she wanted to subcontract both of those duties with me paying 50% of those costs! Huh? Now, maybe I’m not the sharpest knife in the drawer, but if someone else is doing Catherine’s work, refresh me on why I need a partner? But I stayed silent … except to say I wasn’t going to help pay anyone to do her job. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Catherine did request a renegotiation of only the buyout clause for reasons discussed here. She was very happy that Heidi chose instead to trigger the buyout clause. Catherine’s part of the partnership was technical and customer service and she wanted to subcontract both of those duties with me paying 50% of those costs! Huh? Now, maybe I’m not the sharpest knife in the drawer, but if someone else is doing Catherine’s work, refresh me on why I need a partner? But I stayed silent … except to say I wasn’t going to help pay anyone to do her job. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/27/kimkinscom-part-vi-the-partnership-buyout-and-the-post-buyout-backstabbing/#comment-2604</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 09:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/27/kimkinscom-part-vi-the-partnership-buyout-and-the-post-buyout-backstabbing/#comment-2604</guid>
					<description>Miss Prissy, Kimmer told Catherine that she was receiving social security disability for -- exact quote--  "carpal tunnel but more serious."  She always maintained her story about being a foster parent.  She types so much that the carpal tunnel seemed laughable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Miss Prissy, Kimmer told Catherine that she was receiving social security disability for &#8212; exact quote&#8211;  &#8220;carpal tunnel but more serious.&#8221;  She always maintained her story about being a foster parent.  She types so much that the carpal tunnel seemed laughable.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Miss Prissy</title>
		<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/27/kimkinscom-part-vi-the-partnership-buyout-and-the-post-buyout-backstabbing/#comment-2535</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 18:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/27/kimkinscom-part-vi-the-partnership-buyout-and-the-post-buyout-backstabbing/#comment-2535</guid>
					<description>Considering all the information being posted on the forums now about Kimmer/Heidi Diaz receiving SSI Disability payments, can you (*Catherine) confirm that she was receiving SSI and how you knew about it?

Also, did she continue telling you that she was a foster mom still?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering all the information being posted on the forums now about Kimmer/Heidi Diaz receiving SSI Disability payments, can you (*Catherine) confirm that she was receiving SSI and how you knew about it?</p>
<p>Also, did she continue telling you that she was a foster mom still?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Sue</title>
		<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/27/kimkinscom-part-vi-the-partnership-buyout-and-the-post-buyout-backstabbing/#comment-1754</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 01:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/27/kimkinscom-part-vi-the-partnership-buyout-and-the-post-buyout-backstabbing/#comment-1754</guid>
					<description>When is the next instalment due?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When is the next instalment due?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Morgan</title>
		<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/27/kimkinscom-part-vi-the-partnership-buyout-and-the-post-buyout-backstabbing/#comment-1484</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 22:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/27/kimkinscom-part-vi-the-partnership-buyout-and-the-post-buyout-backstabbing/#comment-1484</guid>
					<description>Yes, I meant Catherine, sorry - so many names swirling around this issue, heh.

Thanks for your answer as well, this is something I've been wondering about for awhile now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I meant Catherine, sorry - so many names swirling around this issue, heh.</p>
<p>Thanks for your answer as well, this is something I&#8217;ve been wondering about for awhile now.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/27/kimkinscom-part-vi-the-partnership-buyout-and-the-post-buyout-backstabbing/#comment-1447</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 17:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/27/kimkinscom-part-vi-the-partnership-buyout-and-the-post-buyout-backstabbing/#comment-1447</guid>
					<description>Morgan, I think you mean Catherine, not Christine, right?  Have you read the account of the early before and after pictures in Part IV (http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/10/kimkinscom-part-iv-the-kimkinscom-early-days/)?   The before and after involving the picture that turned out to be Louise Vyent was "Jackie," their family therapist, according to what Heidi told Catherine.  While Catherine was still involved she was instructed not to post Jackie's before and after because "Jackie's" husband forbade it.  Apparently someone decided to post it after Catherine was gone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Morgan, I think you mean Catherine, not Christine, right?  Have you read the account of the early before and after pictures in Part IV (http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/10/kimkinscom-part-iv-the-kimkinscom-early-days/)?   The before and after involving the picture that turned out to be Louise Vyent was &#8220;Jackie,&#8221; their family therapist, according to what Heidi told Catherine.  While Catherine was still involved she was instructed not to post Jackie&#8217;s before and after because &#8220;Jackie&#8217;s&#8221; husband forbade it.  Apparently someone decided to post it after Catherine was gone.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Morgan</title>
		<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/27/kimkinscom-part-vi-the-partnership-buyout-and-the-post-buyout-backstabbing/#comment-1445</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 17:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/27/kimkinscom-part-vi-the-partnership-buyout-and-the-post-buyout-backstabbing/#comment-1445</guid>
					<description>I do have a question about all of this. Martin, you say that Christine did most, if not all, of the work getting the Kimkins website in place. Did that include uploading and posting the B&#38;A Pics? If not, who was responsible for that?

As many of the pictures are so blatantly fake (some photoshopped, some of model Louise Vyent, some of women with different races in the before and after shots) I think understanding who originally posted them would be beneficial in determining the level of fraud and deceit used in this issue.

Who posted the pictures and designed the before and after pages? Were the pictures verified in any way? Was it not obvious to whomever was posting them that in many cases they are clearly not the same person? Didn't anyone question these during the construction phase of the site?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do have a question about all of this. Martin, you say that Christine did most, if not all, of the work getting the Kimkins website in place. Did that include uploading and posting the B&amp;A Pics? If not, who was responsible for that?</p>
<p>As many of the pictures are so blatantly fake (some photoshopped, some of model Louise Vyent, some of women with different races in the before and after shots) I think understanding who originally posted them would be beneficial in determining the level of fraud and deceit used in this issue.</p>
<p>Who posted the pictures and designed the before and after pages? Were the pictures verified in any way? Was it not obvious to whomever was posting them that in many cases they are clearly not the same person? Didn&#8217;t anyone question these during the construction phase of the site?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/27/kimkinscom-part-vi-the-partnership-buyout-and-the-post-buyout-backstabbing/#comment-1437</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 10:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/07/27/kimkinscom-part-vi-the-partnership-buyout-and-the-post-buyout-backstabbing/#comment-1437</guid>
					<description>Whatever, the transaction was handled through an escrow company.  Heidi Diaz wired the money to the escrow company and the escrow company wired the funds to Catherine's bank account.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever, the transaction was handled through an escrow company.  Heidi Diaz wired the money to the escrow company and the escrow company wired the funds to Catherine&#8217;s bank account.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
