<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Surveillance Pics of Heidi Diaz (Kimmer) at the Kimkins.com Post Office Box</title>
	<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/09/05/surveillance-pics-of-heidi-diaz-kimmer-at-the-kimkinscom-post-office-box/</link>
	<description>News and Views on Technology, Business and Internet Marketing</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 00:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: So, You Think You Can Keep The Weight Off After Doing Kimkins Starvation Diet, eh? &#171; Kimkins-Free!</title>
		<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/09/05/surveillance-pics-of-heidi-diaz-kimmer-at-the-kimkinscom-post-office-box/#comment-65570</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/09/05/surveillance-pics-of-heidi-diaz-kimmer-at-the-kimkinscom-post-office-box/#comment-65570</guid>
					<description>[...] However, I was definitely influenced by Heidi Diaz&#8217;s low-fat, low-cal propaganda. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] However, I was definitely influenced by Heidi Diaz&#8217;s low-fat, low-cal propaganda. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kimkins former cover girl speaks out &#171; Say NO to Kimkins</title>
		<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/09/05/surveillance-pics-of-heidi-diaz-kimmer-at-the-kimkinscom-post-office-box/#comment-65148</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 19:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/09/05/surveillance-pics-of-heidi-diaz-kimmer-at-the-kimkinscom-post-office-box/#comment-65148</guid>
					<description>[...] If that&#8217;s not enough, then go read Kimkins Survivors for more tales of illness and trauma brought about by this diet. It&#8217;s too real to ignore. There are those who proclaim that they are doing Kimkins safely - &#8220;safe Kimkins&#8221; means NOT doing Kimkins, so basically aren&#8217;t you just doing Atkins? Who are we kidding here? Why would you pay someone to do Atkins? Especially someone who obviously hasn&#8217;t dieted successfully in their own lifetime? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] If that&#8217;s not enough, then go read Kimkins Survivors for more tales of illness and trauma brought about by this diet. It&#8217;s too real to ignore. There are those who proclaim that they are doing Kimkins safely - &#8220;safe Kimkins&#8221; means NOT doing Kimkins, so basically aren&#8217;t you just doing Atkins? Who are we kidding here? Why would you pay someone to do Atkins? Especially someone who obviously hasn&#8217;t dieted successfully in their own lifetime? [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: In Her Own Words: Christin &#171; &#8220;Kimkins Exposed&#8221; Revived</title>
		<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/09/05/surveillance-pics-of-heidi-diaz-kimmer-at-the-kimkinscom-post-office-box/#comment-59217</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 18:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/09/05/surveillance-pics-of-heidi-diaz-kimmer-at-the-kimkinscom-post-office-box/#comment-59217</guid>
					<description>[...] Remember, we now know that Kimmer (Heidi Diaz) did not lose weight with the diet plan(s) she sells unsuspecting visitors to her website. All you need to do is look at the pictures to see this woman hasn’t dieted for years! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Remember, we now know that Kimmer (Heidi Diaz) did not lose weight with the diet plan(s) she sells unsuspecting visitors to her website. All you need to do is look at the pictures to see this woman hasn’t dieted for years! [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kimkins Dangers Reachs Out… &#171; &#8220;Kimkins Exposed&#8221; Revived</title>
		<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/09/05/surveillance-pics-of-heidi-diaz-kimmer-at-the-kimkinscom-post-office-box/#comment-59029</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 13:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/09/05/surveillance-pics-of-heidi-diaz-kimmer-at-the-kimkinscom-post-office-box/#comment-59029</guid>
					<description>[...] In case you haven’t noticed, there has been a mass exodus of Kimkins members recently. Some of them voluntary, but many were banned for airing their opinions or asking questions that were uncomfortable for Kimmer. They are also not haters, nor are they jealous. They were paid, lifetime members that had concerns that Kimmer would not answer. They wanted to know, from Kimmer’s own words, if the bloggers and forum posts about Kimkins were true. They wanted to know if those pictures posted on slamboard really are of Kimmer now. They just wanted to know. Instead of answers, they were banned from accessing the site that they paid for. Why is that? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] In case you haven’t noticed, there has been a mass exodus of Kimkins members recently. Some of them voluntary, but many were banned for airing their opinions or asking questions that were uncomfortable for Kimmer. They are also not haters, nor are they jealous. They were paid, lifetime members that had concerns that Kimmer would not answer. They wanted to know, from Kimmer’s own words, if the bloggers and forum posts about Kimkins were true. They wanted to know if those pictures posted on slamboard really are of Kimmer now. They just wanted to know. Instead of answers, they were banned from accessing the site that they paid for. Why is that? [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: More Kimmer Pictures Released &#171; &#8220;Kimkins Exposed&#8221; Revived</title>
		<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/09/05/surveillance-pics-of-heidi-diaz-kimmer-at-the-kimkinscom-post-office-box/#comment-58882</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 18:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/09/05/surveillance-pics-of-heidi-diaz-kimmer-at-the-kimkinscom-post-office-box/#comment-58882</guid>
					<description>[...] Slamboard has released more pictures of Heidi Diaz.  They were taken outside of the Postal Annex address uses for Kimkins mail. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Slamboard has released more pictures of Heidi Diaz.  They were taken outside of the Postal Annex address uses for Kimkins mail. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/09/05/surveillance-pics-of-heidi-diaz-kimmer-at-the-kimkinscom-post-office-box/#comment-39134</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 15:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/09/05/surveillance-pics-of-heidi-diaz-kimmer-at-the-kimkinscom-post-office-box/#comment-39134</guid>
					<description>Waiting... Waiting...

Do you have an e-mail address?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Waiting&#8230; Waiting&#8230;</p>
<p>Do you have an e-mail address?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/09/05/surveillance-pics-of-heidi-diaz-kimmer-at-the-kimkinscom-post-office-box/#comment-38682</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/09/05/surveillance-pics-of-heidi-diaz-kimmer-at-the-kimkinscom-post-office-box/#comment-38682</guid>
					<description>The folks at Low Carb Friends are trying to find out if Heidi might have set up an emergency backup site in the form of the Magic Chicken Diet. magicchickendiet.com was registered on 05/02/07, about a month before the Woman's World article came out.

The owners of the site are David and Bonnie Luper of Fort Worth, Texas. Bonnie claims to have lost 160 pounds in ten months on a diet that is very similar to Kimkins. Do you have any way of knowing whether Bonnie was a member of Kimkins while Catherine was still in business with Kimmer? It would be helpful in establishing a Luper-Diaz connection. Thanks in advance for any help you can provide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The folks at Low Carb Friends are trying to find out if Heidi might have set up an emergency backup site in the form of the Magic Chicken Diet. magicchickendiet.com was registered on 05/02/07, about a month before the Woman&#8217;s World article came out.</p>
<p>The owners of the site are David and Bonnie Luper of Fort Worth, Texas. Bonnie claims to have lost 160 pounds in ten months on a diet that is very similar to Kimkins. Do you have any way of knowing whether Bonnie was a member of Kimkins while Catherine was still in business with Kimmer? It would be helpful in establishing a Luper-Diaz connection. Thanks in advance for any help you can provide.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/09/05/surveillance-pics-of-heidi-diaz-kimmer-at-the-kimkinscom-post-office-box/#comment-38289</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/09/05/surveillance-pics-of-heidi-diaz-kimmer-at-the-kimkinscom-post-office-box/#comment-38289</guid>
					<description>I am not suing anyone, and IMO I am not dumb, but I am going to address this anyway.  The key facts of the Kimkins fiasco are that she lied about her success on the diet plan.  Her success was a primary selling point and it was used both explicitly and implicitly as evidence that the diet was safe and effective as a long term weight loss solution.  This is a pretty clear case of fraud.  Atkins was a real person who followed his own advice consistently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not suing anyone, and IMO I am not dumb, but I am going to address this anyway.  The key facts of the Kimkins fiasco are that she lied about her success on the diet plan.  Her success was a primary selling point and it was used both explicitly and implicitly as evidence that the diet was safe and effective as a long term weight loss solution.  This is a pretty clear case of fraud.  Atkins was a real person who followed his own advice consistently.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Shannon</title>
		<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/09/05/surveillance-pics-of-heidi-diaz-kimmer-at-the-kimkinscom-post-office-box/#comment-38182</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/09/05/surveillance-pics-of-heidi-diaz-kimmer-at-the-kimkinscom-post-office-box/#comment-38182</guid>
					<description>I don't understand the beef with Kimkins.....most diets are dangerous...have you ever looked at them?  What about Atkins...He would have been sued if he hadn't died.  Look at all the silly things people do...cabbage soup diet, fasting with cayenne pepper???  Oh, yeah, those are safe.  People are dumb.  They should do their own research.  Why do we keep wasting tax payers money because people can't think for themselves and are like little kids who need constant supervision?  It's Jr. high health that eating less than 1200 for most people will put your body into starvation mode...Most people should eat at least 1500 or 2000.  Come on PEOPLE.  Take some responsibility for your actions and stop suing people cause you're dumb!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand the beef with Kimkins&#8230;..most diets are dangerous&#8230;have you ever looked at them?  What about Atkins&#8230;He would have been sued if he hadn&#8217;t died.  Look at all the silly things people do&#8230;cabbage soup diet, fasting with cayenne pepper???  Oh, yeah, those are safe.  People are dumb.  They should do their own research.  Why do we keep wasting tax payers money because people can&#8217;t think for themselves and are like little kids who need constant supervision?  It&#8217;s Jr. high health that eating less than 1200 for most people will put your body into starvation mode&#8230;Most people should eat at least 1500 or 2000.  Come on PEOPLE.  Take some responsibility for your actions and stop suing people cause you&#8217;re dumb!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: a</title>
		<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/09/05/surveillance-pics-of-heidi-diaz-kimmer-at-the-kimkinscom-post-office-box/#comment-34033</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/09/05/surveillance-pics-of-heidi-diaz-kimmer-at-the-kimkinscom-post-office-box/#comment-34033</guid>
					<description>hey g o s, you are supposed to click on the thumbnails, then you get big pictures, one of which clearly shows her face.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey g o s, you are supposed to click on the thumbnails, then you get big pictures, one of which clearly shows her face.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
