<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A New Kimmer/Heidi Diaz Before Photo</title>
	<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/09/08/a-new-kimmerheidi-diaz-before-photo/</link>
	<description>News and Views on Technology, Business and Internet Marketing</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 15:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Kimkins Update from Christin &#171; Say NO to Kimkins</title>
		<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/09/08/a-new-kimmerheidi-diaz-before-photo/#comment-71977</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/09/08/a-new-kimmerheidi-diaz-before-photo/#comment-71977</guid>
					<description>[...] In today’s episode, Jimmy talks with Christin Sherburne, former cover-girl for Heidi Diaz’s Kimkins diet scheme that hit the big time last year after landing on the cover of Woman’s World magazine. Besides appearing on the cover of that issue of the popular national women’s magazine in support of “Kimmer’s” diet plan, Christin also worked directly for Heidi as the Kimkins PR representative for a few months. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] In today’s episode, Jimmy talks with Christin Sherburne, former cover-girl for Heidi Diaz’s Kimkins diet scheme that hit the big time last year after landing on the cover of Woman’s World magazine. Besides appearing on the cover of that issue of the popular national women’s magazine in support of “Kimmer’s” diet plan, Christin also worked directly for Heidi as the Kimkins PR representative for a few months. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Julie</title>
		<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/09/08/a-new-kimmerheidi-diaz-before-photo/#comment-7293</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 06:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/09/08/a-new-kimmerheidi-diaz-before-photo/#comment-7293</guid>
					<description>Heidi Diaz is a fraud.  The kimkins diet may work for some but that is because they are watching what they eat.  Not because of the kimkins diet.  I read an article that she was support foster kids.  I don't believe she has any.  Don't think she is a good person because she's not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heidi Diaz is a fraud.  The kimkins diet may work for some but that is because they are watching what they eat.  Not because of the kimkins diet.  I read an article that she was support foster kids.  I don&#8217;t believe she has any.  Don&#8217;t think she is a good person because she&#8217;s not.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Big Loser</title>
		<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/09/08/a-new-kimmerheidi-diaz-before-photo/#comment-7128</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 19:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/09/08/a-new-kimmerheidi-diaz-before-photo/#comment-7128</guid>
					<description>Hi all -- 

Yes, I am a member of Kimkins - and so far I have lost 47 pounds in 11 weeks - but, I have to tell you - I switched to a much healthier diet as of this morning - the thought of losing my already thin hair put some fear into me - may lose the weight alot slower (53 lbs to go!) but at least I'll have my hair! AND my eybrows! 

Anyway, the one thing I am having trouble figuring out with all this - probably stupid, but, why would a woman who has made hundreds of thousands of dollars still live in an upstairs apartment?Has to be hard carrying those groceries up stairs.... Guess I notice the weird things....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all &#8212; </p>
<p>Yes, I am a member of Kimkins - and so far I have lost 47 pounds in 11 weeks - but, I have to tell you - I switched to a much healthier diet as of this morning - the thought of losing my already thin hair put some fear into me - may lose the weight alot slower (53 lbs to go!) but at least I&#8217;ll have my hair! AND my eybrows! </p>
<p>Anyway, the one thing I am having trouble figuring out with all this - probably stupid, but, why would a woman who has made hundreds of thousands of dollars still live in an upstairs apartment?Has to be hard carrying those groceries up stairs&#8230;. Guess I notice the weird things&#8230;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: oldbie</title>
		<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/09/08/a-new-kimmerheidi-diaz-before-photo/#comment-6961</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 16:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/09/08/a-new-kimmerheidi-diaz-before-photo/#comment-6961</guid>
					<description>I Received a call from an old friend yesterday. She pointed me to several sites and all this "kimmer" Drama. I was a member of LCF for about 10 years now ( yeah, before the current owndership) and had butted heads with "Kimmer" many times. I also respected her. When she originally posted a before..and got a lot of crap...( they thought her stats even back then didn't match the pics) I defended her as I respect anyone who had struggles with their weight and won. Over time, I saw a thoughtful helpful woman get very full of her own power. She began to belittle fellow low-carbers and out and out called me a "lier" when I said "stillman's stops working for me after a few weeks" ( this was even before she  came up with "her plan") I saw her increasingly become more and more angry and agressive that her way was the only way. ( By the way..her way is simply a combo of Stillman's and Atkins..to the 10th power) I unfortunatly was on the back fringe of drama when she left..and watched her demise now.

I also must say..I'm not at all surprised if, indeed, this becomes a huge scam. I could see that possibility from the start. She was always obsessivly private. She became almost obsessive about her advice. She became angrier by the week. The only thing I'm truly shocked about is how many people followed her advice without question. Things like " you never need to exercise" or " I don't believe in drinking water" all things that go against any healthy plan ever invented! Why did no one question her non-qualifications? Why would anyone pay for a plan that was all over the net for free?

I am truly sorry for those who became ill or broke due to this insanity...there are many many low-carb plans available that can get you to goal in a healthy way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I Received a call from an old friend yesterday. She pointed me to several sites and all this &#8220;kimmer&#8221; Drama. I was a member of LCF for about 10 years now ( yeah, before the current owndership) and had butted heads with &#8220;Kimmer&#8221; many times. I also respected her. When she originally posted a before..and got a lot of crap&#8230;( they thought her stats even back then didn&#8217;t match the pics) I defended her as I respect anyone who had struggles with their weight and won. Over time, I saw a thoughtful helpful woman get very full of her own power. She began to belittle fellow low-carbers and out and out called me a &#8220;lier&#8221; when I said &#8220;stillman&#8217;s stops working for me after a few weeks&#8221; ( this was even before she  came up with &#8220;her plan&#8221;) I saw her increasingly become more and more angry and agressive that her way was the only way. ( By the way..her way is simply a combo of Stillman&#8217;s and Atkins..to the 10th power) I unfortunatly was on the back fringe of drama when she left..and watched her demise now.</p>
<p>I also must say..I&#8217;m not at all surprised if, indeed, this becomes a huge scam. I could see that possibility from the start. She was always obsessivly private. She became almost obsessive about her advice. She became angrier by the week. The only thing I&#8217;m truly shocked about is how many people followed her advice without question. Things like &#8221; you never need to exercise&#8221; or &#8221; I don&#8217;t believe in drinking water&#8221; all things that go against any healthy plan ever invented! Why did no one question her non-qualifications? Why would anyone pay for a plan that was all over the net for free?</p>
<p>I am truly sorry for those who became ill or broke due to this insanity&#8230;there are many many low-carb plans available that can get you to goal in a healthy way.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Erin</title>
		<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/09/08/a-new-kimmerheidi-diaz-before-photo/#comment-4457</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 15:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/09/08/a-new-kimmerheidi-diaz-before-photo/#comment-4457</guid>
					<description>You can tell that the "hair" in this picture is def. a wig....take it from a person that use to wear them...its a wig!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can tell that the &#8220;hair&#8221; in this picture is def. a wig&#8230;.take it from a person that use to wear them&#8230;its a wig!!!!!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: greegreeyaya</title>
		<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/09/08/a-new-kimmerheidi-diaz-before-photo/#comment-4413</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 04:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/09/08/a-new-kimmerheidi-diaz-before-photo/#comment-4413</guid>
					<description>http://www.labbb.org/BBBWeb/Forms/Utils/CompanyReviews.aspx?CompanyID=100055868</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.labbb.org/BBBWeb/Forms/Utils/CompanyReviews.aspx?CompanyID=100055868" rel="nofollow">http://www.labbb.org/BBBWeb/Forms/Utils/CompanyReviews.aspx?CompanyID=100055868</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: greegreeyaya</title>
		<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/09/08/a-new-kimmerheidi-diaz-before-photo/#comment-4412</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 04:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/09/08/a-new-kimmerheidi-diaz-before-photo/#comment-4412</guid>
					<description>Martin, it is time to show the pic of Brandon. He is an adult, and furthermore his pics have already been posted when he was a minor so it's silly not to post those of him as an adult today? Besides most of us have already seen him on myspace.

also may we see parts of the PI's report? maybe the reciept he saw in the trash (block names if you must)

also I have a question that I dont know if you and Catwant to answer or not: Were you paid in full in the buy-out? or did Kimmer somehow default on that?


PS here is a link to the BBB, if any would like to write a review of Kimkins.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martin, it is time to show the pic of Brandon. He is an adult, and furthermore his pics have already been posted when he was a minor so it&#8217;s silly not to post those of him as an adult today? Besides most of us have already seen him on myspace.</p>
<p>also may we see parts of the PI&#8217;s report? maybe the reciept he saw in the trash (block names if you must)</p>
<p>also I have a question that I dont know if you and Catwant to answer or not: Were you paid in full in the buy-out? or did Kimmer somehow default on that?</p>
<p>PS here is a link to the BBB, if any would like to write a review of Kimkins.com
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: From the Inside</title>
		<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/09/08/a-new-kimmerheidi-diaz-before-photo/#comment-4330</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 14:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/09/08/a-new-kimmerheidi-diaz-before-photo/#comment-4330</guid>
					<description>Whether or not the membership counts are right . . . 

I am still a member of the kimkins site, but just long enought to get my friends out.  I was also there when Catherine was there.  (Hi Cat!)

So, I was there before the Woman's World (WW) article came out. The site literally EXPLODED once the WW article was published.  You didn't have to look at the member count to see the hundreds upon hundreds of new members joining each day and posting "I'm new" questions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether or not the membership counts are right . . . </p>
<p>I am still a member of the kimkins site, but just long enought to get my friends out.  I was also there when Catherine was there.  (Hi Cat!)</p>
<p>So, I was there before the Woman&#8217;s World (WW) article came out. The site literally EXPLODED once the WW article was published.  You didn&#8217;t have to look at the member count to see the hundreds upon hundreds of new members joining each day and posting &#8220;I&#8217;m new&#8221; questions.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kimmerexia</title>
		<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/09/08/a-new-kimmerheidi-diaz-before-photo/#comment-4326</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 13:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/09/08/a-new-kimmerheidi-diaz-before-photo/#comment-4326</guid>
					<description>Since it's already been well established that one Heidi Kimberly 'Kimmer' [Miller] Diaz is a pathological liar, why would anyone believe the membership counts that were formerly posted on her website as being factual?

Why were the membership counts removed from the website?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since it&#8217;s already been well established that one Heidi Kimberly &#8216;Kimmer&#8217; [Miller] Diaz is a pathological liar, why would anyone believe the membership counts that were formerly posted on her website as being factual?</p>
<p>Why were the membership counts removed from the website?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Another Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/09/08/a-new-kimmerheidi-diaz-before-photo/#comment-4281</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 06:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.slamboard.com/2007/09/08/a-new-kimmerheidi-diaz-before-photo/#comment-4281</guid>
					<description>[I have to wonder how much money she actually made.]

I know just before the Womans World issue hit the stands, there were about 2000 members.  By the time she stopped showing stats, there were over 20,000 members, and that was in the hot-and-heavy WW campaign, so I don't doubt that many more signed up.   I assume all of them paid the $60 (but who knows what to believe).  So, 20,000 x $60 = $1,200,000.  I'd say that's a very modest estimate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[I have to wonder how much money she actually made.]</p>
<p>I know just before the Womans World issue hit the stands, there were about 2000 members.  By the time she stopped showing stats, there were over 20,000 members, and that was in the hot-and-heavy WW campaign, so I don&#8217;t doubt that many more signed up.   I assume all of them paid the $60 (but who knows what to believe).  So, 20,000 x $60 = $1,200,000.  I&#8217;d say that&#8217;s a very modest estimate.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
