http://www.slamboard.com/2008/04/19/scientology-advertising-on-youtube/ News and Views on Technology, Business and Internet Marketing Fri, 05 Dec 2008 01:00:35 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7 http://www.slamboard.com/2008/04/19/scientology-advertising-on-youtube/#comment-82659 Tue, 26 Aug 2008 08:01:12 +0000 http://www.slamboard.com/2008/04/19/scientology-advertising-on-youtube/#comment-82659 I am not making an argument against freedom of speech or freedom of association or freedom of religion. I am arguing that scientology is a negative entity that does harm and that Google should refuse to provide advertising space on YouTube or elsewhere. I am not making an argument against freedom of speech or freedom of association or freedom of religion. I am arguing that scientology is a negative entity that does harm and that Google should refuse to provide advertising space on YouTube or elsewhere.

]]> http://www.slamboard.com/2008/04/19/scientology-advertising-on-youtube/#comment-82525 Mon, 25 Aug 2008 21:28:46 +0000 http://www.slamboard.com/2008/04/19/scientology-advertising-on-youtube/#comment-82525 This is part of what I say on my Yahoo Group 'Interrupting people is perfectly normal in common day life. It’s normal to interrupt people while they’re working, talking or during their leisure time. Finally all this just represents part of the economic process. All this assuming that you’re courteous and reasonable on the phone/Net/Face to Face. If one of the 2 or more people can’t handle all this, she or he must have a problem. So why shouldn't this apply to Scientology? If they want to communicate their ideas, why not. All people are free to choose or should we be living in a society which looks after us, surveys what we do and assumes that individuals cannot look after themselves ? Or am I being unfair? This is part of what I say on my Yahoo Group ‘Interrupting people is perfectly normal in common day life. It’s normal to interrupt people while they’re working, talking or during their leisure time. Finally all this just represents part of the economic process. All this assuming that you’re courteous and reasonable on the phone/Net/Face to Face. If one of the 2 or more people can’t handle all this, she or he must have a problem. So why shouldn’t this apply to Scientology? If they want to communicate their ideas, why not. All people are free to choose or should we be living in a society which looks after us, surveys what we do and assumes that individuals cannot look after themselves ? Or am I being unfair?

]]>