I just discovered a really great debate about the much touted and oft doubted death of print as an important medium of communication.
The original publication was in 2005. I this corner, we have Jeff Jarvis, who blogs at BuzzMachine.com. In the other corner, we have National Geographic’s John Griffin.
The entire piece is well worth a read, but here are a couple of cherry picked quotes:
I’ve argued on my blog that in our post-scarcity world, distribution is not king and neither is content. Conversation is the kingdom, and trust is king.
The wild, wild west of the Internet will evolve to more consolidation of the biggest brands at the top and an infinite number of tiny fragments at the bottom. The public will have neither the time nor interest to consider all of the options available to them–so the role of editor, both human and electronic, will increase in importance as people look for experts to help sift, validate and organize the infinite sources of content.
I have to say that I agree with both of these points.
I am very much dependent upon online sources of information. I don’t watch television and I don’t even have a radio in my house. I don’t subscribe to a newspaper. I have purchased two Sunday papers this year. There are a few situations where I do read print media. I will spent 20 minutes leafing through a complimentary paper at a cafe. I have all the out of date magazines at the doctor and the dentist pretty much memorized. I think that lingering nature of print has real value for advertisers and content providers.
I think I have mentioned once before in a blog that my first exposure to the horrors of war came from looking at Time Magazine in the waiting room while my mother was in the doctor’s office for my infant brother’s checkup. I think those shocking and powerful images had some influence over who I am today.